The “persuader industry” comprises firms and consultants hired by employers to obstruct worker unionization. Persuaders,” as they are referred to by the U.S. Department of Labor, utilize a range of tactics to thwart union organizing efforts. These tactics include disseminating false and misleading information about unions and their potential impact on worker benefits. They also employ intimidation tactics such as mandatory captive audience meetings where anti-union messages are delivered. Furthermore, persuaders may engage in surveillance, monitoring union activity and targeting pro-union employees, while also following workers, conducting one-on-one meetings, and collecting personal employee information that can be leveraged against organizing workers.
The persuader industry presents a significant threat to the right of working people to collectively bargain for better working conditions. Furthermore, persuaders are often hired to target already marginalized populations.
Section 203 of the LMRDA and Regulation:
Section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) requires some disclosure of activities and expenditures related to influencing union organizing. However, loopholes and weak enforcement have significantly limited the effectiveness of transparency laws designed to protect the fundamental rights of workers and the public.
The Scale of the Industry:
Hundreds of companies hire persuaders and spend millions of dollars every year to thwart unionization efforts. The industry is becoming increasingly sophisticated and well-funded, posing a huge challenge to workers seeking to exercise their right to collective bargain.
Impact on Workers:
The persuader industry plays a central role in suppressing unionization efforts in the United States, hindering workers’ ability to collectively bargain for better wages, improved benefits, and safer working conditions.
